ALMA Movement MP Irene Charalambidou has called for a full investigation into the publication of personal data during the release of MPs’ asset declarations (Pothen Esches), arguing that sensitive information was disclosed in breach of the law.
In a letter dated 21 October 2026 to the President of the House of Representatives and members of the Leaders’ Conference, Charalambidou alleges that information published on the parliament's website included personal data relating to spouses and minor children of MPs, as well as tax reconciliation declarations submitted to the Tax Commissioner.
She says the information was subsequently reproduced by media outlets, further increasing its circulation.
According to Charalambidou, despite a parliamentary announcement stating that the declarations had been withdrawn, the data remained accessible until late on 20 October.
‘This is an issue of accountability’
In her letter, Charalambidou argues that the relevant legislation was designed to promote transparency while protecting the rights of third parties.
She maintains that the law clearly distinguishes between information that may be made public and information that must remain protected, but alleges those provisions were not respected.
Rejecting suggestions that the incident was caused by oversight or time pressure, she argues that procedures and deadlines were known well in advance.
“When an institution has the time, the means and a clear legal framework and nevertheless violates it, the issue is not technical. It is an issue of accountability,” she states.
She also warns that those affected may seek legal remedies through the courts or the Commissioner for Personal Data Protection.
According to Charalambidou, the matter cannot be resolved through a simple apology or a general acceptance of responsibility.
“Responsibility that is not accompanied by an investigation, specific persons and specific measures is not responsibility.”
Six requests
The MP asks for the matter to be included as a standalone item at the next meeting of the Leaders’ Conference.
She also requests:
- A written report detailing how the publication occurred.
- Clarification on who approved the publication and what checks were carried out.
- Information on how long the data remained publicly accessible.
- Written notification to all affected individuals.
- Formal notification of the Commissioner for Personal Data Protection.
- Measures to limit further dissemination of the published data.
- A written verification protocol for future publications, with clearly defined responsibilities.
‘This goes beyond every limit’
Charalambidou concludes that recent developments have damaged parliament's image, but argues that this case is particularly serious because it concerns the institution's credibility.
“This case goes beyond every limit because it concerns the core of our credibility: the obligation to be the first to correctly apply the laws that we ourselves pass.”
The letter was also sent to the House Committee on Institutions.
