AKEL Accuses Nikos Christodoulides of ‘Inaction’ Over 167,000 Cypriots at Risk of Poverty

Party says latest Eurostat data exposes growing inequality and government shortcomings.

Header Image

 

AKEL has launched a sharp attack on the government and President Nikos Christodoulides, citing what it describes as inaction in addressing rising poverty risks in Cyprus.

In a statement issued following the Labour Day marches, the party said thousands of workers who took to the streets delivered a “resounding response” to what it called empty government promises lacking real impact.

AKEL pointed to Eurostat data for 2025, highlighting that 167,000 people in Cyprus are at risk of poverty or social exclusion, an increase of 3,000 compared to 2024. It also criticised the level of the minimum wage, noting that it stands at 55 percent of the median wage, below the European Union’s target of 60 percent.

The party placed particular emphasis on delays in transposing the EU directive on collective agreements. According to AKEL, Cyprus should have implemented the directive by November 2024 to ensure coverage for 80 percent of workers. The delay, it argued, leaves employees exposed to labour market deregulation.

Referring to the Labour Day demonstrations organised by trade union PEO, AKEL said the turnout reflected a clear message from the workforce against inequality.

“The country does not belong to the banks and the richest 1 percent who exploit its wealth,” the statement said, calling for a fair redistribution of wealth in favour of the middle class and vulnerable groups.

AKEL concluded by pledging to continue its efforts for decent wages, collective agreements and fair working hours, stressing that workers who “drive the economy” are entitled to fundamental, protected rights.

Comments Posting Policy

The owners of the website www.politis.com.cy reserve the right to remove reader comments that are defamatory and/or offensive, or comments that could be interpreted as inciting hate/racism or that violate any other legislation. The authors of these comments are personally responsible for their publication. If a reader/commenter whose comment is removed believes that they have evidence proving the accuracy of its content, they can send it to the website address for review. We encourage our readers to report/flag comments that they believe violate the above rules. Comments that contain URLs/links to any site are not published automatically.