EU Sets New Rules for Smartphones With Major Changes From 2027

New regulations will require replaceable batteries, longer software support and easier repairs across all devices sold in the EU.

Header Image

 

The European Union is set to overhaul the smartphone market with sweeping new rules that will apply to all devices sold from 2027, marking a decisive shift away from short product lifecycles and limited repairability.

The measures form part of the bloc’s broader eco-design framework, aimed at cutting electronic waste, extending product lifespan and reducing consumer dependence on frequent upgrades.

For years, smartphones have been designed to be increasingly sealed, making repairs difficult and costly. Batteries are often glued in place, spare parts are limited, and software support typically fades after a few years. The new rules seek to reverse that model.

Easier battery replacement

One of the most significant changes concerns batteries. From 2027, manufacturers will be required to design smartphones so that batteries can be replaced easily, without specialised tools or complex procedures.

While this does not necessarily mean a return to older removable back covers, it does require designs that allow straightforward and low-cost battery replacement without damaging the device.

At the same time, battery durability standards will be tightened. New requirements state that batteries must retain at least 80% of their original capacity after 800 full charge cycles, extending their useful life well beyond current norms.

Longer lifespan through repairs

The new framework also introduces strict obligations on repairs. Manufacturers will have to provide essential spare parts, including screens, cameras, charging ports and batteries, for up to seven years after a model is withdrawn from sale.

These parts must be delivered within a reasonable timeframe, ensuring repairs can be carried out quickly rather than delayed for weeks.

In addition, independent repair professionals will gain access to the necessary tools, software and documentation, removing barriers that have historically limited third-party repairs.

The changes are expected to revive the repair market, giving consumers more choice and lowering maintenance costs.

Extended software support

Software longevity is another key pillar of the reforms. Companies will be required to provide operating system and security updates for at least five years after a device is no longer sold.

This is intended to ensure that smartphones remain secure, compatible and functional for longer, reducing the need for premature replacement.

New consumer label

Consumers will also see a new standardised label on devices, similar to energy efficiency ratings used for household appliances.

The label will provide information on battery performance, durability, resistance to dust and water, energy efficiency and ease of repair. A dedicated repairability score will allow buyers to compare devices based on how easy they are to fix.

Impact on manufacturers and market

The reforms are expected to have a significant impact on major manufacturers, particularly those that rely on tightly sealed designs.

Devices may become slightly thicker or heavier as a result of more durable components and repair-friendly construction. However, they are also likely to last longer and offer better long-term value.

For companies, the shift could alter business models that currently depend on frequent device upgrades. Revenue streams may increasingly move towards services, software and maintenance rather than hardware turnover.

A broader shift in mindset

Beyond technical requirements, the EU’s move reflects a wider attempt to reshape consumer behaviour.

Instead of treating smartphones as short-lived products, the new framework promotes durability, repairability and long-term use. If successful, it could redefine how devices are designed, sold and used across the European market.

Source: In.gr

Comments Posting Policy

The owners of the website www.politis.com.cy reserve the right to remove reader comments that are defamatory and/or offensive, or comments that could be interpreted as inciting hate/racism or that violate any other legislation. The authors of these comments are personally responsible for their publication. If a reader/commenter whose comment is removed believes that they have evidence proving the accuracy of its content, they can send it to the website address for review. We encourage our readers to report/flag comments that they believe violate the above rules. Comments that contain URLs/links to any site are not published automatically.