Body Cameras for Police Uniforms and Vehicles: When They Will Be Used

Revised justice ministry bill sets out strict conditions for the activation, use and storage of audiovisual recordings by police officers, aiming to protect both officers and the public while strengthening evidence in criminal cases.

Header Image

A revised bill regulating the use of body-worn cameras by police officers is set to be examined on Wednesday by the House Legal Affairs Committee. Submitted by the Ministry of Justice, the legislation outlines when and how cameras may be activated on uniforms and police vehicles, as well as safeguards governing the handling and destruction of recorded material.

Revised bill returns to parliament

The updated legislation allows for the installation and use of portable cameras on police uniforms, equipment, plain-clothes attire and service vehicles, with or without police markings. The bill was first submitted in early 2023 but faced objections from police associations, which called for exemptions for specific categories of officers and clearer rules on data management and responsibility.

In response, the ministry revised the text to address concerns, including the protection of undercover operations and the explicit designation of responsibility for audiovisual material.

What the bill provides

The main provisions of the revised bill include the following:

Authorised use and visibility

Portable cameras may record audio and video following approval by the Chief of Police. While operating, the devices must emit a visible light signal to indicate recording. Any audiovisual material produced may be used as evidence in criminal, disciplinary or civil proceedings.

Purpose of camera use

The cameras aim to protect police officers from false complaints, safeguard the public from potential police misconduct and improve the quality of evidence relating to criminal offences.

When cameras may be activated

Officers may activate body cameras only in specific situations, including:

  • During the arrest or search of any person.
  • When entering and searching premises.
  • During the pursuit of a person or vehicle.
  • When stopping a person or vehicle for investigative purposes.
  • Upon arrival at the scene of a criminal offence.
  • When an officer is attacked, faces resistance or is obstructed while on duty.
  • During high-risk operations.

The bill defines a high-risk operation as a volatile or dangerous situation that may result in death, injury or property damage and requires immediate police action. Indicative examples include riot control, terrorist incidents, kidnappings, hostage situations, armed robberies, prison uprisings, exchanges of gunfire, suicide attempts and the execution of court orders under the Mental Health Law.

Unmarked police vehicles

Cameras in vehicles without police markings may be activated only once it is clearly and visibly communicated to the person being pursued or stopped that the vehicle belongs to the police, through sirens, lights or another clear method.

Conditions and limitations

Upon activation, the officer must clearly state the date, time and location for recording purposes.

Where feasible, individuals within the recording field must be informed that the camera is operating.

Recording must cease immediately once the purpose for activation has been fulfilled, with the officer again stating the date, time and location.

Retention and destruction of material

Audiovisual material that forms part of evidentiary records must be destroyed once court proceedings are concluded or an investigation is discontinued.

Penalties for unauthorised use

Any person who deliberately activates a body camera without authorisation, accesses recorded material without permission or allows unauthorised access commits an offence. Upon conviction, offenders face a prison sentence of up to three years.

The bill will be discussed by the parliamentary committee before moving forward in the legislative process.

Comments Posting Policy

The owners of the website www.politis.com.cy reserve the right to remove reader comments that are defamatory and/or offensive, or comments that could be interpreted as inciting hate/racism or that violate any other legislation. The authors of these comments are personally responsible for their publication. If a reader/commenter whose comment is removed believes that they have evidence proving the accuracy of its content, they can send it to the website address for review. We encourage our readers to report/flag comments that they believe violate the above rules. Comments that contain URLs/links to any site are not published automatically.